Obama warned Trump about Flynn during their Oval Office meeting on November 10, days after Trump was elected president.
Obama's concerns, which he relayed to Trump, were not related to the firing of Flynn from the Defense Intelligence Agency but rather in the course of the investigation into Russian interference into the 2016 election.
"Flynn's name kept popping up," according to a senior Obama administration source.
Flynn previously served as the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency under Obama until he was reportedly forced out of the post 2014 over internal disagreements over policy and management.
Trump did not heed Obama's counsel on Flynn, bringing aboard the former military intelligence officer who supported Trump during his campaign as his national security adviser. Trump fired Flynn 24 days later when news broke of Flynn's conversations with Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak.
News of the warning comes as former acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify before Congress on Monday about the concerns she expressed to Trump administration officials about Flynn's contacts with Russian officials, namely with Kislyak.
Yates, in her role as acting attorney general, warned White House counsel Don McGahn on January 26 that Flynn was lying when he denied -- both publicly and privately -- that he discussed US sanctions on Russia with Kislyak. It wasn't until weeks later that Trump asked for Flynn's resignation, only after news surfaced that Flynn had misled Vice President Mike Pence about his conversations with Kislyak.
Yates' testimony on Monday will be the first time she speaks publicly about her warnings to the White House about Flynn.
The Senate and House intelligence committees are continuing to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election, including potential coordination between Russian officials and the Trump campaign or people close to the campaign.
Congressional investigators have so far homed in on Flynn, Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, and Roger Stone, who informally advised Trump during his presidential run.
While Trump asked for Flynn's resignation, he has not abandoned his former national security adviser altogether.
Trump on Monday morning sought to get ahead of Yates' testimony, taking to Twitter to deflect criticism that he or his administration should have kept Flynn out of the top national security post from the outset.
"General Flynn was given the highest security clearance by the Obama administration -- but the Fake News seldom likes talking about that," Trump said in his first missive.
"Ask Sally Yates, under oath, if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to W.H. Counsel," he tweeted.
Flynn began advising Trump on national security in early 2016 and soon became a constant presence by Trump's side as he crisscrossed the country from rally to rally.
Flynn frequently introduced Trump at his campaign rallies, delivering introductory remarks rife with criticism of the Obama administration's foreign policy and of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. Flynn often led Trump supporters in chants of "Lock her up!" as he accused her of corruption and negligence in her use of a private email server.
Trump came to value Flynn not only for his like-minded view of global affairs but for his loyalty throughout the campaign.
NOTE: So then when Trump claims that Flynn was vetted by the Obama Administration, is this what he meant? That President Obama warned Trump "to stay away" from Flynn? Really strange. If I were running for President, even if I thought that the current President might be giving bogus or politicized advice, I think I might be compelled to do an extra vetting just in case. And, we haven't heard from Sally Yates yet who is also rumored to testify that she too notified Trump about the dangers of Flynn. Don't forget, Flynn was fired by Obama back in 2014 for "differences in policy matters," a pretty vague reason. Could it be that by this time he was already under suspicion as a traitor? Of course, the Rust Belters and Fox News will simply see this as more liberal BS and Fake News because we are still pissed off that Hillary didn't win and we are doing our best to hinder Trump's agenda. HA! Right folks. Looks to me as if we are fninaly making some headway in the whole Trump/Russia investigation.
I had a sudden revelation the other day while perusing the
veggie section of our local Whole Foods Market:I own not a single pair of “skinny
jeans.”How, you might ask, did I
suddenly stumble across this personal truth and profound revelation?Well, while fingering the “organic” bananas that always seem to be too green to me and comparing them to the
“regular, old fashioned, cheaper non-organic” ones, I noticed that I was in the
company of half a dozen young men all wearing skinny jeans and all examining organic
California oranges or the latest shipment of white asparagus – organic - also
from California.Now there was the
aspect that five out of the six young men (Millennials, I assumed) were very
easy on my eyes. On anyone's eyes if you want the truth. Some sported very chic short-trimmed beards, strong chiseled chins, sparkling eyes, ad worthy faces, and a couple who looked quite buff in their chest hugging checked lumberjack shirts …
A NARRATIVE THAT ENABLES VIOLENCE AGANST US AS IT DID
PART ONE If you haven’t kept up with the right wing’s
latest attacks on liberals for protesting and resisting Trump then you probably
will disagree with me that I believe that we are heading for new wave of
violence against liberal demonstrators, protesters and resistors as well as against free speech and
the continued diminishment of basic civil and human rights right here in
America. We’ve seen such actions before
during the Civil Rights and Anti-Vietnam War days of the 1960’s.With our backs against the well, as they
surely are today, and the national atmosphere even more repressive with the
Trump Administration, you can depend on it. Why do I say what’s happening to us today
resembles what happened to African Americans during Jim Crow?In no way do I intend to portray the “plight”
of liberals and progressives today as analogous to the post Civil War situation
of African Americans following the passage of the 13th
CAN WHITE MEN COMPETE IN THE DICK SIZE COMPETITION? ADVISORY: I write this
piece in a spirit of newsworthiness and fun.It contains language that might be offensive to some.But, if you are among the half of American
voters who supported Trump, then you’ll be accustomed to “Tellin’ It Like It
Is,” “Straight, Non-PC Language” “And Pussy Grabbing” as popular news items.
Okay, so the average size of White men’s cocks as opposed to
the average size of Black men’s cocks, may not seem like some vital issue
America needs to resolve immediately.But if you think that the question “Do Black Men Have Bigger Cocks Then
White Men? “ is just a benign offshoot of the culture wars, for example, you
would be wrong.Among White American
males there is probably no single issue – income inequality, illegal
immigration and gun control notwithstanding – that is a more important issue
facing them (us) today.Now, of course,
this is not a topic that The Donald or The Bern addressed in their political
campaigns – …