ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FINALLY PUTTING THE HILLARY CRIMINAL E-MAIL SCANDAL TO BED

BY FBI DIRECTOR, NO LESS!  WOW!!!

We all remember FBI Director, James Comey's testimony in front of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee back on July 7, 2016 following the FBI's investigation of the Clinton e-mail scandal.  The FBI did not find any law breaking on the part of Clinton although Republicans were thrilled as Comey castigated her for carelessness.  Last Sunday, Hillary appeared on Fox News and the right wing press had a field day when she said to Chris Wallace that Comey had basically said that she had been truthful about what she has told the American people.  Fine.  I can see where folks would find fault with her statement.  The latest "big deal" is about her testimony that "there was no classified material in her e-mails" which she has repeated many times.

  But here's the key part of his Comey's testimony:


This, I suspect, is also the sources of Hillary's "lie" on Fox News last Sunday that the Post pounced on, but the news media were so entranced by The Donald's weekend performances over slamming dead Muslim Army heroes and women that the Clinton e-mail scandal totally lost out to The Donald's ravings.

<

But from last Sunday's Fox News broadcast, the Washington Post's Fact Checker gave Hillary 4 Pinocchio's for what they cited as inaccuracies in her statements.   POST GIVES CLINTON 4 PINOCHIO'S   But the Post is wrong. Their intricate parsing of who said what when, belies what FBI Director Comey stated under oath (including that he was not qualified to give any opinion on whether or not Clinton lied under oath while testifying before Congress) that she never sent any classified e-mails.  Clinton, by any reasonable assessment by people (like me) who are actually familiar with classified materials, is right.

My own experience, 20 years of working for the State Department, supports Hillary's claims.  In the thousands upon thousands of classified e-mails, documents, drawings, and photographs I've received, created, stored and destroyed, in all those years, never once did I see a classified document that did not have a cover sheet clearly - in something like 36 point type - indicating the document's level of classification.  Not only this, but each and every page was also marked with the document's classification typically at the top and at the bottom of each page.

Those [C]'s in the three e-mails that indicated classified paragraphs within the document with no cover sheet?  Never saw a single one of these either.  Now I'm not saying that they don't exist, just that in over 20 years I never saw one.  And folks, I'm not talking about a few documents here and there.  I'm talking about literally hundreds of thousands of documents that as the office Security Officer for the firm I was responsible for.  If any of you are aware of how many studies, reports, drawings and specification it takes to design a building, you will know exactly what I mean.  Plus, I read thousands more classified documents produced directly by the State Department in dozens of U.S. Embassies and Chanceries around the world (including in SCIF rooms in Kabul and Baghdad) over a twenty year period.  

This entire e-mail "scandal" reminds me of the old Wendy's ad:




By the way, in all those years of State Department work, we never had a single security breach.

 NOTE:  Of course we all know that Director Comey's words will not silence the Hillary Haters.  After all, how many hours of testimony, how many reports and how many Congressional Hearings have there been over Benghazi since 2012 and STILL one of our Presidential Candidates brings it up every chance he gets.  Then, too, he also brought up the Vince Foster murder which is 26 years old.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REAL LIFE STORY OR REAL LIFE HOAX?

HOW THE PORTRAYAL OF LIBERAL AMERICANS BY THE RIGHT WING MEDIA REFERENCES THE JIM CROW MOVEMENT

AMERICA’S BIG BLACK DICK CONUNDRUM