VIRGINIA APPEALS COURT LEADS THE WAY IN TURNING BACK ANTI-LGBT LAWS

Appeals Court Sides With Trans Student Denied Access To High School Boys Bathroom

The court adopted the Obama administration’s position that federal law prohibits discrimination against transgender students.

Christian Farias
Huffington Post

A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled in favor of a trans student in Virginia who sued his county school board over a policy barring him from using the boys bathroom at his high school.
The student, Gavin Grimm, had alleged that the Gloucester County School Boardengaged in sex discrimination in violation of his rights under federal law and the U.S. Constitution, and asked a lower court to order the school to allow him to use the facilities.
A federal judge denied his request and dismissed the lawsuit in July. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, which sits in Richmond, Virginia, reversed that determination and reinstated Grimm’s lawsuit.
More notably, the appeals court accorded “controlling weight” to the U.S. Department of Education’s interpretation of its own regulations under Title IX, which forbids federally funded schools from discriminating on the basis of sex and has been interpreted by the Obama administration to include exclusion of trans students on the basis of their gender identity.
“We conclude that the Department’s interpretation of its own regulation … as it relates to restroom access by transgender individuals, is entitled to … deference and is to be accorded controlling weight in this case,” wrote U.S. Circuit Judge Henry Floyd for a 2-to-1 court.
Floyd did recognize that, absent a formal challenge to the government’s reading of its own regulations, the political process could still force a change in the law.
“Not only may a subsequent administration choose to implement a different policy, but Congress may also, of course, revise Title IX explicitly to prohibit or authorize the course charted here by the Department regarding the use of restrooms by transgender students,” he wrote.
Grimm’s case, which is being spearheaded by the American Civil Liberties Union, has drawn widespread support from a host of civil rights and LGBT organizations, as well as from the federal government, which filed a brief in support of Grimm in October.
After oral arguments in the case in January, a tearful Grimm told reporters of his humiliation after he learned of his local school board’s policy. “I didn’t set out to make waves. I set out to use the bathroom,” he said at the time.
The teen’s school won’t be forced to grant him access just yet: The case is now back with the lower court, which has to conduct a new hearing in light of Tuesday’s ruling.

NOTE:  I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTION THAT EVERY SINGLE ANTI-LGBT BATHROOM LAWS WILL BE OVERTURNED.  THE SUPREME COURT – EVEN THIS CONSERVATIVE ONE – CANNOT SAY THAT BANS ON SAME SEX MARRIAGES ARE ILLEGAL AND THEN TURN AROUND AND RULE THAT BANNING BATHROOM USE BASED ON ONE’S CURRENT (OR PAST) SEXAUL IDENTITY  IS SOMEHOW PERMISSIBLE.  SURE, THE SUPREME COURT IN IT’S HOBBY LOBBY DECISION HAS GIVEN RISE TO A WHOLE RAFT OF BIBLICALLY BASED DISCRIMINATORY LAWS, BUT I’M EQUALLY AS HOPEFUL THAT WHEN THESE LAWS WORK THEIR WAY UP TO THE COURT, THEY TOO WILL BE TURNED AROUND.  SECEPT FOR SILENT CLARENCE, OF COURSE, WHO DOESN’T THINK THAT SEXUAL HARASSMENT IS ANY REASON TO DENY A SEAT ON THE NATION’S HIGHEST COURT.   

Take care all!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REAL LIFE STORY OR REAL LIFE HOAX?

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: THE TRUMP/PUTIN LOVE CHRONCILES

SHE SHOWED HIM HERS, HE SHOWED HER HIS. AND HE GOT BUSTED!