BLACK REPUBLICAN DR. BEN CARSON NOW AHEAD OF JEB BUSH

Ben Carson Gives Himself Permission to Use Fetal Tissue, NO ONE ELSE



The Republican Party doesn't fare all that well among minorities and they are aware of it.  Of course they don't poll well among women either who happen to make up the majority of the U.S. population (Y: 158 million vs. X: 151 million).  Now I'm guessing that The Donald's surge in the recent polls is probably not going to endear the party to Latinos but another "surger" in popularity is Dr. Ben Carson.  The Johns Hopkins physician is now in third place - ahead of Jeb Bush - among Republicans after his performance in the Fox News pseudo debate.  He railed against Planned Parenthood and maybe some other things but I can't recall anything else.    I'm guessing that his popularity is hinged to the fact that he is a Black man and the Republican Party fares even worse than it does with Latinos when it comes to acceptability among Black voters.  But like so many of the other right wing pretenders to the Presidential throne, Dr. Carson is just as slippery when it comes to facts.  Here's an illuminating article from Gawker that more or less destroys his credibility.   

After weeks of GOP candidates pandering to the anti-Planned Parenthood masses, it looks like the one man who should know better re:fetal tissue donations—famed ex-neurosurgeon Ben Carson—actually does know better. Or at least, he did back in 1992 when he did his own research on 17-week fetal tissue. But, according to Carson, that was different.

This frantic attempt at revisionist history started when author and OB/GYN Dr. Jen Gunter discovered the candidate’s paper Colloid Cysts of the Third Ventricle: Immunohistochemical evidence for nonneuropithelial differentiation (catchy!) in a ‘92 publication of the Human Pathology medical journal.
From Gunter’s blog post on her discovery:

Dr. Carson, like everyone, is entitled to an opinion no matter how wrong, What he says doesn’t change the fact that fetal tissue plays a vital role in medical research. For example it is being used to develop a vaccine against Ebola. Many researchers depend on fetal tissue to understand and hopefully develop treatment for a myriad of conditions from blindness to HIV. Without fetal tissue neurosciences research, something essential for the development of neurosurgical techniques, would be far less developed. Dr. Carson should be intimately aware of this fact.

And how! But as Gunter points out, just this past July, Carson went on Fox News to say that “it’s been over-promised what the benefits of fetal research would be. And very much under-delivered. And if you go back over the years, and look at the research that has been done and all the things that it was supposed to deliver, very little of that has been done, and there’s nothing that can’t be done without fetal tissue.”

All of which would seem to make him look like one hell of a hypocrite. But as Carson so kindly explains to The Washington Post, no, it does not. His reasoning: “To willfully ignore evidence that you have for some ideological reason is wrong.” Agreed! Unfortunately, he goes on, “If you’re killing babies and taking the tissue, that’s a very different thing than taking a dead specimen and keeping a record of it.”

While Carson’s reasoning is largely nonsensical and relies on the use of “synonyms” to make the words sound “slightly different,” it’s worth noting that the fetuses used in Carson’s research were, in fact aborted:



It’d be one thing if—like his fellow candidates, ostensibly—Carson was spouting off incorrect and potentially highly damaging rhetoric because he actually didn’t know any better. But the good doctor is clearly fully aware of both the necessity and the great potential for good that lies in using fetal tissue in medical research. But hey, maybe it’s only ok when he does it.

By Ashely Feinberg, Gawker

I'm guessing that Carson's latest poll surge - like Trump's - will not result in his nomination to the position of Republican Presidential Candidate.  I mean it's one thing for Democrats to nominate and elect a Black man as President.  But Republican?  No way in hell is that EVER going to occur.  It's going to be fascinating to watch how Tea Baggers react to Carson's duplicitous mouthing about abortion once this info gets spread around the internet.  On the other hand, if past performance is any indication, the right wingers will simply say that it's all a left wing, main stream media smear campaign.  


CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS POST

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: THE TRUMP/PUTIN LOVE CHRONCILES

REAL LIFE STORY OR REAL LIFE HOAX?

HOW THE PORTRAYAL OF LIBERAL AMERICANS BY THE RIGHT WING MEDIA REFERENCES THE JIM CROW MOVEMENT